Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

Swaye
Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
edited April 2020 in Tug Tavern
Game time fuckers.



edit: Making it the official game thread and pinning so you can get all your piles of plague bodies updates throughout this week of ULTIMATE DEATH!
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134567…398

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,025
    edited April 2020
    Officials stats* get posted at 4PM.

    *as adjusted by the AAU scorekeepers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,589 Standard Supporter
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04F4xlWSFh0
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,216 Founders Club
    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    This is a good read
    https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2020/04/06/ihme-sharply-reduces-projected-hospitalizations-data-shows-nys-curve-flattening/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,639 Founders Club
    There’s definitely context things going around in the data reporting. The death output seems to be worst case and then when it comes in less, social distancing is being lauded. I seem to recall a time where the deaths that were being projected were with the social distancing assumption built in, so that can’t be the reason for variance in actuals.

    Part of the issue is too many models with wildly different assumptions and reporting taking pieces from each as if it were an integrated model.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,589 Standard Supporter
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    This is a good read
    https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2020/04/06/ihme-sharply-reduces-projected-hospitalizations-data-shows-nys-curve-flattening/

    Andrew Combover and Bill Deblah are heroes now, despite bad orange man. They flattened the curve thanks to their brilliance. Never mind that Deblasio said everything was normal well into March.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogieMcDoogerson
    DoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,506
    I find this chart interesting and the commentary describing it interesting. This is probably something the news should pick up on but it doesn't fit their narrative. "Deaths show by date of onset."


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,844
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    What do you have to lose? I may try it, I’ll have to talk to my doctor.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    They're just props in your world, anyway.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
    I'm just here for the body count.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LesGrossman
    LesGrossman Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,500 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    I'm just here for the body count.




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dugdawg
    Dugdawg Member Posts: 308
    MikeDamone said:

    I’m hearing if it’s not this week, then it will be next week.

    Why not both? Abundance!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    haie said:

    It's been a bloodbath the last 24 hours. First day of Carnage Week about in the books and we've gone from 70k deaths worldwide to 70k deaths worldwide.

    Please think about this mountain of corpses and your vulnerable loved ones the next time you go outside.

    Stop being positive, you Bully. This is the Dems last gasp at 2020. Don’t you even want to see a tight race?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Swaye said:

    I'm just here for the body count.

    Will there be a gang bang pre-func?

    I like where your mind lives.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter